Author: Catherine Michini
School/Organization:
The Philadelphia High School for Girls
Year: 2016
Seminar: Biography as History, or, Perhaps, History as Biography
Grade Level: 9-12
Keywords: Alumni Legacy, biographies, Biographies of Alumni in STEM Careers, biography, Gender Bias, High School, Interview Skills, interviewing, Interviewing an Honor Math Student, Journalism, Learning from Peers, Math, Science, Self-Reflection Questions, STEM Careers, Women in STEM Careers
School Subject(s): Math, Science
The purpose of this curriculum unit is to educate young women on careers in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields and on the women who broke down barriers to open those doors. The project is based on students (or teams of students) conducting interviews and reflecting on the societal and personal barriers that have made gender ratios in STEM careers so imbalanced.
Student teams will interview alumnae from their high school who went on to work in STEM careers learn about job pre-requisites, responsibilities and what influences led the women to that field. Students will also hear about the high school experiences of the women in STEM careers and get advice from the graduates. Once the students have looked into the past, they will look to the future by interviewing upperclassmen who excel at mathematics about strategies and techniques they attribute to their success. These upperclassmen will also offer advice to the freshmen.
To prepare for the interview process students will develop listening and critical thinking skills for writing questions and follow-up questions.
The hope for the unit is that students will find inspiration and methods to succeed and perhaps pursue careers in STEM fields.
Download Unit: 16.01.07-unit.pdf
Did you try this unit in your classroom? Give us your feedback here.
For years, there has been conversation about a bias against girls in mathematics classrooms and careers. Author Claire Cain Miller writes in The Upshot, an online news and data visualization portal on the New York Times‘ website, about a study done by Victor Lay and Edith Sand published in The National Bureau of Economic Research. She states, “the most important finding in the paper is that a biasing teacher affects the work choices students make and whether to study math and science years later.” The researchers reason that encouragement given to girls during elementary school could increase their confidence and decrease the gender gap. In his web article for Science, John Bohannon says that not only do both male and female teachers call on girls in math class less frequently than boys, but they are hired less frequently for math related jobs by both male and female employers. Many girls enter high school feeling as if they are inadequate in mathematics. I have 30 years experience teaching mathematics in coed classrooms and have seen many young women adopt various behaviors in math class. Some girls don’t answer questions because they don’t want to get an answer wrong and some girls don’t answer questions because they don’t want to get it right! Finding a female student who excels in math is not always an easy task in a coeducational high school. As a relatively new teacher at The Philadelphia High School for Girls, I was inspired by the behavior of girls in single-sex classrooms. For obvious reasons, they cannot experience gender bias at this stage of their education. Girls are willing to make mistakes in front of their peers, which is one of the most important competencies in learning mathematics. If a student waits to answer until she knows she is right, there will be holes in her content knowledge. I am happy to report that my girls are supportive of each other, giving positive reinforcement to those who get answers right and support to those who get answers wrong. What a head start to excelling in mathematics and choosing math or science as a college major when the classroom is a fertile environment for learning. It’s no wonder that so many graduates of Girls’ High went on to pursue STEM careers even before the term STEM existed! A discussion of mathematics education these days must reference the new Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. These standards were developed to allow students to develop an understanding and appreciation of mathematics and not just rote procedures to solve problems. The Common Core State Standards recommend attention and use of the 8 Mathematical Practices. The Standards for Mathematical Practice describe ways in which developing student practitioners of the discipline of mathematics increasingly ought to engage with the subject matter as they grow in mathematical maturity and expertise throughout the elementary, middle and high school years. As a student in the class “Biography as History or Perhaps History as Biography,” I was drawn in to the individuals we studied, as much by their day-to-day lives as by their accomplishments. Given the opportunity to interview alumnae and ask about their lives and their accomplishments and careers will enable students to see their future selves in STEM careers and the path to get there. Through the completion of this unit, I hope to be able to provide the students with ample opportunities to see the value math has had in women’s lives and how valuable these women are to the world!
This unit is intended for high school students in math or science classes. This unit could fit anywhere in the school year and could also be done as two separate projects: Part 1 and Part 2. I would recommend that the student interviews take place after the first report card, so the teacher can identify successful math students. The Objectives of the unit will include the following: .
Lesson 1 “The Top Secret Rosies” Learning Objective: At the end of this lesson, students will be able to explain how WWII opened the door for women in the workforce, specifically in the field of mathematics and explain the significance of the human computing they did. Materials: Procedures: Lesson 2 Select an alumna to interview Learning Objective: At the end of this lesson, students will have selected a graduate of their high school who has had or is in a career in math and/or science. Materials: Procedures: Lesson 3 Developing interview skills – Follow-up Questions Learning Objective: At the end of this lesson, students will be able to ask follow up questions that demonstrate listening and critical thinking skills. Materials: Procedures: Lesson 4 Developing Interview Skills – Writing Questions Learning Objective: At the end of this lesson, students will be able to use research and critical thinking skills to write interview questions. Materials: Procedures: Lesson 5 Writing Interview Questions for Students’ Alumna Learning Objectives: At the end of this lesson, student teams will have a list of interview questions to ask their alumna. Materials: Procedures: Lesson 6 Interviewing Alumna Lesson Objectives: At the end of this lesson, the student teams will have recorded (video and/or audio) or transcribed an interview with an alumna who has or who had a career in a STEM field. Materials: Procedures: Lesson 7 Interviewing a Good Math Student Learning Objectives: At the end of this lesson, student teams will have recorded or transcribed an interview with a fellow high school student who is doing well in math class. Materials: Procedures: Lesson 8 Self-Reflection Learning Objectives: At the end of this lesson, students will reflect on the project: what they learned, how this will influence their math studies, their career choices and their future. Materials: Procedures: Endnotes
NGSS Lead States. “Next Generation Science Standards: For States By States” Appendix-L_CCSS Math Connections 2013 Achieve, Inc. http://www.nextgenscience.org/ Bohannon, John. “Both Genders Think Women Are Bad at Basic Math” Science AAAS Latest News, 10 March 2015. Web. 07 June 2016. Interviewing and the Health History Bates’ Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. p. 35 http://culturalmeded.stanford.edu/pdf%20docs/Bates_Chapter_2.pdf Top Secret Rosies The Female Computers of World War II. Dir. LeAnn Erickson. PBS, 2010. DVD. Paulita Jackson. “Michael Jackson Oprah Winfrey Interview FULL.” YouTube. YouTube, 30 Nov. 2013. Web. 01 Aug. 2016. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbItFJJPPmA>. Burton, Susan. “Terry Gross and the Art of Opening Up.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 24 Oct. 2015. Web. 01 Aug. 2016. <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/magazine/terry-gross-and-the-art-of-opening-up.html?_r=0>. “Maurice Sendak: On Life, Death And Children’s Lit.” NPR. NPR, n.d. Web. 01 Aug. 2016. <http://www.npr.org/2011/12/29/144077273/maurice-sendak-on-life-death-and-childrens-lit>. Resources for Teachers https://storycorps.me/ Instructions for downloading the StoryCorp app to a computer or smart phone. This is an excellent device to assist students in the interview process, it suggests questions or allows you to write your own and takes you through the entire interview process including recording. After recording the interview the user has an option to keep it local on their device or to upload it to the StoryCorps.me platform. http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/how-to-record-a-skype-call-on-your-pc-or-mac/ This website gives directions to record a Skype call incase you are using that as an interview platform. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FQWpfZIPT8 “Women are as capable mathematically as men, so why aren’t there more women in mathematical research? Are female mathematicians as ambitious as men? Are the accomplishments of female mathematicians as recognized as those of men? Dr. Lynne Walling (Reader and Head of Pure Mathematics at University of Bristol) explores these questions in her talk “Women and Men: Ambition in an ambivalent society” at the School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Nottingham. She also discusses barriers and discouragement women in mathematics often face, and strategies women might employ.” http://www.upworthy.com/these-6-women-got-written-out-of-tech-history-theyre-finally-being-recognized?g=2&c=upw1 Article on the women from Philadelphia who were among the first to program ENIAC. This complements and gives more detail than the documentary “The Top Secret Rosies”. http://www.tamuc.edu/academics/colleges/humanitiessocialsciencesarts/departments/literatureLanguages/firstYearWriting/interviewQuestions.aspx. Tips for writing interview questions. http://www.wikihow.com/Write-Interview-Questions Simplified notes on writing interview questions http://thewritepractice.com/six-ways-to-ask-better-questions-in-interviews/ More notes on writing interview questions Paslay, Charles S. Highly Effective Writing: Interdisciplinary Writing Program, Reasoning, Writing, and Achievement. Wilmington, DE: Systematic Achievement, 2006. Print. This manual contains multiple ideas for writing in all subject areas.Cain Miller, Claire. “How Elementary School Teachers’ Biases Can Discourage Girls From Math and Science.” The Upshot-The New York Times, 07 Feb. 2015. Web. 07 June 2016
Appendix includes: Top Secret Rosies – The Female Computers of World War II A Documentary by LeAnn Erikson These questions can be discussion questions or questions students answer as they view the documentary. Preparation for Interviewing Activity Before the students interview their alumna or their peers, they must develop and practice good interviewing procedures. Teach them the techniques of skilled interviewing: The following table uses an interview Oprah Winfrey did with Michael Jackson. Although Oprah has interviewed many celebrities, I chose this video because Michael Jackson’s fame is universal and timeless. He did not grant many interviews, so this is very special. Oprah’s Interview with Michael Jackson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbItFJJPPmA Notice: Oprah doesn’t just ask question, she prefaces question with things she notices about Michael performing. Excerpts from Terry Gross and the Art of Opening Up by Susan Burton Oct. 21, 2015 This fall, Gross marks her 40th anniversary hosting ‘‘Fresh Air.’’ At 64, she is ‘‘the most effective and beautiful interviewer of people on the planet,’’ as Marc Maroon said recently, while introducing an episode of his podcast, ‘‘WTF,’’ that featured a conversation with Gross. She’s deft on news and subtle on history, sixth- sensey in probing personal biography and expert at examining the intricacies of artistic process. She is acutely attuned to the twin pulls of disclosure and privacy. ‘‘You started writing memoirs before our culture got as confessional as it’s become, before the word ‘oversharing’ was coined,’’ Gross said to the writer Mary Karr last month. ‘‘So has that affected your standards of what is meant to be written about and what is meant to maintain silence about?’’ (‘‘That’s such a smart question,’’ Karr responded. ‘‘Damn it, now I’m going to have to think.’’) Gross says very little about her own life on the air. ‘‘I try not to make it about me,’’ Gross told me. ‘‘I try to use my experiences to help me understand my guests’ experiences, but not to take anything away from them.’’ Early in her career, she realized that remaining somewhat unknown allows ‘‘radio listeners to do what they like to do, which is to create you.’’ She added, ‘‘Whatever you need me to be, I’ll be that.’’ Over the years, Gross has done some 13,000 interviews, and the sheer range of people she has spoken to, coupled with her intelligence and empathy, has given her the status of national interviewer. Think of it as a symbolic role, like the poet laureate — someone whose job it is to ask the questions, with a degree of art and honor. Barbara Walters was once our national interviewer, in a flashier style defined by a desire for spectacle. Gross is an interviewer defined by a longing for intimacy. In a culture in which we are all talking about ourselves more than ever, Gross is not only listening intently; she’s asking just the right questions. Matthew Weiner, the creator of ‘‘Mad Men,’’ has been among the most frequent guests on ‘‘Fresh Air.’’ He imagined being interviewed by Gross years before it first happened, and once it did, ‘‘you’re like: Oh, this is my fantasy of a conversation,’’ Weiner told me. ‘‘I’m not even talking about people hearing it. I’m talking about actually having the conversation.’’ ‘‘Having the conversation’’ — that’s what’s compelling about the wish. It’s a wish not for recognition but for an experience. It’s a wish for Gross to locate your genius, even if that genius has not yet been expressed. It’s a wish to be seen as in a wish to be understood. The interview wish is as old as the form itself. Journalistic interviews in the United States increasingly began to appear in the 1860s. Before that, when reporters talked to people, they typically didn’t quote them. Once interviewing started, it became a craze. It had its own practitioners, often women, who were thought to be better at drawing people out. Henry James’s journalists were almost all ‘‘interviewers,’’ and his characters, like Selah Tarrant in ‘‘The Bostonians,’’ crave their scrutiny: ‘‘The wish of his soul was that he might be interviewed,’’ James wrote. At first the interview was regarded as a particularly American phenomenon — pushy, but fair too, because it involved the cooperation of the interviewee, not just a sneaky reporter. The practice shifted radically after World War II. Television gained popularity — the age of the broadcast interviewer began. And psychoanalysis — that other great innovation in opening people up — was being practiced more widely. Gross’s interviews have often been compared to therapy. That’s in part because of her seemingly neutral stance, but also because of the feeling of safety she gives her interviewees. Once in a while, a guest confesses to Gross that he’s confiding something for the very first time. ‘‘I don’t know that I’ve said that to anyone,’’ the ‘‘Project Runway’’ host Tim Gunn told Gross in 2014, of spending time in a psychiatric hospital as an adolescent. Gross’s response was as affecting as Gunn’s story. She handles confessions quietly, acknowledging the weight of what’s been said without drawing undue attention to it. Gross herself started seeing a therapist several years ago. ‘‘When she asks me a question that gets exactly to the heart of what I’m trying to say, but maybe haven’t articulated clearly, it just feels so good,’’ Gross told me. ‘‘My ideal as an interviewer is to be the person who gets it. Like somebody can tell you something really personal,’’ she continued, and ‘‘you can ask them something that can help them comfortably move to the next place and go deeper.’’ She went on: ‘‘Hearing someone speak really personally, and having that affirm your experience as a sexual person, or as a sick person, or just as a person trying to get through daily life, is really valuable. And I think that’s why we turn to literature, I think that’s why we turn to film, beyond the entertainment it gives us.’’ Gross’s impulse to explore what provokes her — the impulse that drove her to pick up the landline and call Craven — underlies her 40 years of interviews. Ira Glass, who was my boss at ‘‘This American Life,’’ observes that Gross brings ‘‘real questions she personally has been wondering about’’ to the kind of interviews that tell us ‘‘what should we make of the latest news from Iraq or Syria’’ — as well as the good editorial sense of when to let an expert ‘‘march off in unplanned directions.’’ He adds: ‘‘There’ve been times when I’ve relistened, just to hear the order of the questions and to figure out what was planned and unplanned. Like a magician sitting in on another guy’s act for two nights so he can figure out the trick, to steal it.’’ Glass singles out Gross’s ‘‘great improviser’s performance chops. Not surprising that she loves jazz artists and stand-up comedians so much. She’s their journalist peer.’’ That’s when she asks herself: What do I care about? What in all of this research is meaningful? It’s important to be away from her notes when she does this. She emerges from the shower with her ‘‘major destination points.’’ Then she goes to her office and refers back to her notes — sheafs of facts; dog-eared, marked-up books — for the details. A version of this article appears in print on October 25, 2015, on page MM34 of the Sunday Magazine with the headline: How to Talk to Strangers. New York Times Magazine http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/magazine/terry-gross-and-the-art-of-opening-up.html?emc=eta1 Maurice Sendak: On Life, Death And Children’s Lit : NPR http://www.npr.org/2011/12/29/144077273/maurice-sendak-on-life-death-and-childrens-lit Alumna Interview Question Bank Honor Math Student Question Bank Self Reflection Questions For this project, you have:
Time
1.
8:19 – 8:56
Oprah “You seem to come alive onstage … Were you as happy offstage as you were onstage?”
Michael: “I was very sad.”
To Students: What would you ask next? How would you continue?
8:56-9:59
Oprah uses guided questions to draw out answers from Michael
2.
16:40 – 17:15
Oprah: “How did adolescence affect you?… Was that a particularly difficult time for you?
Michael: “Very, very difficult.”
To students: What would you ask next? How would you continue?
3
17:15-21:00
Oprah asks “How so?” She validates and reassures Michael while listening. She says “I understand.” She asks provoking questions and clarifying questions.
From PA Academic Standards for Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening: From the Next Generation Science Standards 9-12 Connection Statements Modern civilization depends on major technological systems, such as agriculture, health, water, energy, transportation, manufacturing, construction, and communications. From Common Core State Standards for Mathematics, The Standards for Mathematical Practices: The Standards for Mathematical Practice describe ways in which developing student practitioners of the discipline of mathematics increasingly ought to engage with the subject matter as they grow in mathematical maturity and expertise throughout the elementary, middle and high school years.