Lesson One-Morrison’s Nobel Prize Lecture
Student Learning Objective: Students will be able to read and discuss Toni Morrison’s Nobel Prize Lecture in order to understand the symbolism of language in Morrison’s speech. Students will be able to intercept the meaning of Morrison’s lecture as a result of engaging in a collaborative discussion on Morrison’s main points of the lecture.
Prerequisite Knowledge: Students must understand the definitions of the terms “white gaze” “New World Woman”
Materials: lecture transcript, guiding questions handout, writing utensil or electronic mechanism for highlighting/annotating the text, dictionary, thesaurus, Frayer Model worksheet (see Appendix)
Vocabulary: moribund, despot, fiat, nefarious, ineffable, griot, reprimand, imperiled, thwarts, demagogue, obscure, fascist, cataclysmic, detract, miasma
*Vocabulary can be taught explicitly or organically as students annotate the text or be assigned as homework.
Lesson Duration: The duration of this lesson would span a 90-minute class period or 2 45-minute class periods.
The textual anchor for this curriculum unit is Morrison’s 1993 Nobel Prize speech. In this lecture Morrison echoes the adage that is signature to her career–language fosters a certain power.
Directions: Read the following speech. As you read, highlight/annotate the passages, phrases or words that relate to the guiding questions. After you finish reading, write a written response to the lecture by answering the guiding questions. Your responses to the guiding questions will be used to engage in a small or whole group collaborative discussion.
Toni Morrison
Nobel Lecture December 7, 1993
Listen to an audio recording of Toni Morrison’s Nobel Lecture
“Once upon a time there was an old woman. Blind but wise.” Or was it an old man? A guru, perhaps. Or a griot soothing restless children. I have heard this story, or one exactly like it, in the lore of several cultures.
“Once upon a time there was an old woman. Blind. Wise.”
In the version I know the woman is the daughter of slaves, black, American, and lives alone in a small house outside of town. Her reputation for wisdom is without peer and without question. Among her people she is both the law and its transgression. The honor she is paid and the awe in which she is held reach beyond her neighborhood to places far away; to the city where the intelligence of rural prophets is the source of much amusement.
One day the woman is visited by some young people who seem to be bent on disproving her clairvoyance and showing her up for the fraud they believe she is. Their plan is simple: they enter her house and ask the one question the answer to which rides solely on her difference from them, a difference they regard as a profound disability: her blindness. They stand before her, and one of them says, “Old woman, I hold in my hand a bird. Tell me whether it is living or dead.”
She does not answer, and the question is repeated. “Is the bird I am holding living or dead?”
Still she doesn’t answer. She is blind and cannot see her visitors, let alone what is in their hands. She does not know their color, gender or homeland. She only knows their motive.
The old woman’s silence is so long, the young people have trouble holding their laughter.
Finally she speaks and her voice is soft but stern. “I don’t know”, she says. “I don’t know whether the bird you are holding is dead or alive, but what I do know is that it is in your hands. It is in your hands.”
Her answer can be taken to mean: if it is dead, you have either found it that way or you have killed it. If it is alive, you can still kill it. Whether it is to stay alive, it is your decision. Whatever the case, it is your responsibility.
For parading their power and her helplessness, the young visitors are reprimanded, told they are responsible not only for the act of mockery but also for the small bundle of life sacrificed to achieve its aims. The blind woman shifts attention away from assertions of power to the instrument through which that power is exercised.
Speculation on what (other than its own frail body) that bird-in-the-hand might signify has always been attractive to me, but especially so now thinking, as I have been, about the work I do that has brought me to this company. So I choose to read the bird as language and the woman as a practiced writer. She is worried about how the language she dreams in, given to her at birth, is handled, put into service, even withheld from her for certain nefarious purposes. Being a writer she thinks of language partly as a system, partly as a living thing over which one has control, but mostly as agency – as an act with consequences. So the question the children put to her: “Is it living or dead?” is not unreal because she thinks of language as susceptible to death, erasure; certainly imperiled and salvageable only by an effort of the will. She believes that if the bird in the hands of her visitors is dead the custodians are responsible for the corpse. For her a dead language is not only one no longer spoken or written, it is unyielding language content to admire its own paralysis. Like statist language, censored and censoring. Ruthless in its policing duties, it has no desire or purpose other than maintaining the free range of its own narcotic narcissism, its own exclusivity and dominance. However moribund, it is not without effect for it actively thwarts the intellect, stalls conscience, suppresses human potential. Unreceptive to interrogation, it cannot form or tolerate new ideas, shape other thoughts, tell another story, fill baffling silences. Official language smitheryed to sanction ignorance and preserve privilege is a suit of armor polished to shocking glitter, a husk from which the knight departed long ago. Yet there it is: dumb, predatory, sentimental. Exciting reverence in schoolchildren, providing shelter for despots, summoning false memories of stability, harmony among the public.
She is convinced that when language dies, out of carelessness, disuse, indifference and absence of esteem, or killed by fiat, not only she herself, but all users and makers are accountable for its demise. In her country children have bitten their tongues off and use bullets instead to iterate the voice of speechlessness, of disabled and disabling language, of language adults have abandoned altogether as a device for grappling with meaning, providing guidance, or expressing love. But she knows tongue-suicide is not only the choice of children. It is common among the infantile heads of state and power merchants whose evacuated language leaves them with no access to what is left of their human instincts for they speak only to those who obey, or in order to force obedience.
The systematic looting of language can be recognized by the tendency of its users to forgo its nuanced, complex, mid-wifery properties for menace and subjugation. Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge. Whether it is obscuring state language or the faux-language of mindless media; whether it is the proud but calcified language of the academy or the commodity driven language of science; whether it is the malign language of law-without-ethics, or language designed for the estrangement of minorities, hiding its racist plunder in its literary cheek – it must be rejected, altered and exposed. It is the language that drinks blood, laps vulnerabilities, tucks its fascist boots under crinolines of respectability and patriotism as it moves relentlessly toward the bottom line and the bottomed-out mind. Sexist language, racist language, theistic language – all are typical of the policing languages of mastery, and cannot, do not permit new knowledge or encourage the mutual exchange of ideas.
The old woman is keenly aware that no intellectual mercenary, nor insatiable dictator, no paid-for politician or demagogue; no counterfeit journalist would be persuaded by her thoughts. There is and will be rousing language to keep citizens armed and arming; slaughtered and slaughtering in the malls, courthouses, post offices, playgrounds, bedrooms and boulevards; stirring, memorializing language to mask the pity and waste of needless death. There will be more diplomatic language to countenance rape, torture, assassination. There is and will be more seductive, mutant language designed to throttle women, to pack their throats like paté-producing geese with their own unsayable, transgressive words; there will be more of the language of surveillance disguised as research; of politics and history calculated to render the suffering of millions mute; language glamorized to thrill the dissatisfied and bereft into assaulting their neighbors; arrogant pseudo-empirical language crafted to lock creative people into cages of inferiority and hopelessness.
Underneath the eloquence, the glamor, the scholarly associations, however stirring or seductive, the heart of such language is languishing, or perhaps not beating at all – if the bird is already dead.
She has thought about what could have been the intellectual history of any discipline if it had not insisted upon, or been forced into, the waste of time and life that rationalizations for and representations of dominance required – lethal discourses of exclusion blocking access to cognition for both the excluder and the excluded.
The conventional wisdom of the Tower of Babel story is that the collapse was a misfortune. That it was the distraction, or the weight of many languages that precipitated the tower’s failed architecture. That one monolithic language would have expedited the building and heaven would have been reached. Whose heaven, she wonders? And what kind? Perhaps the achievement of Paradise was premature, a little hasty if no one could take the time to understand other languages, other views, other narratives period. Had they, the heaven they imagined might have been found at their feet. Complicated, demanding, yes, but a view of heaven as life; not heaven as post-life.
She would not want to leave her young visitors with the impression that language should be forced to stay alive merely to be. The vitality of language lies in its ability to limn the actual, imagined and possible lives of its speakers, readers, writers. Although its poise is sometimes in displacing experience it is not a substitute for it. It arcs toward the place where meaning may lie. When a President of the United States thought about the graveyard his country had become, and said, “The world will little note nor long remember what we say here. But it will never forget what they did here,” his simple words are exhilarating in their life-sustaining properties because they refused to encapsulate the reality of 600, 000 dead men in a cataclysmic race war. Refusing to monumentalize, disdaining the “final word”, the precise “summing up”, acknowledging their “poor power to add or detract”, his words signal deference to the uncapturability of the life it mourns. It is the deference that moves her, that recognition that language can never live up to life once and for all. Nor should it. Language can never “pin down” slavery, genocide, war. Nor should it yearn for the arrogance to be able to do so. Its force, its felicity is in its reach toward the ineffable.
Be it grand or slender, burrowing, blasting, or refusing to sanctify; whether it laughs out loud or is a cry without an alphabet, the choice word, the chosen silence, unmolested language surges toward knowledge, not its destruction. But who does not know of literature banned because it is interrogative; discredited because it is critical; erased because alternate? And how many are outraged by the thought of a self-ravaged tongue?
Word-work is sublime, she thinks, because it is generative; it makes meaning that secures our difference, our human difference – the way in which we are like no other life.
We die. That may be the meaning of life. But we do language. That may be the measure of our lives.
“Once upon a time, …” visitors ask an old woman a question. Who are they, these children? What did they make of that encounter? What did they hear in those final words: “The bird is in your hands”? A sentence that gestures towards possibility or one that drops a latch? Perhaps what the children heard was “It’s not my problem. I am old, female, black, blind. What wisdom I have now is in knowing I cannot help you. The future of language is yours.”
They stand there. Suppose nothing was in their hands? Suppose the visit was only a ruse, a trick to get to be spoken to, taken seriously as they have not been before? A chance to interrupt, to violate the adult world, its miasma of discourse about them, for them, but never to them? Urgent questions are at stake, including the one they have asked: “Is the bird we hold living or dead?” Perhaps the question meant: “Could someone tell us what is life? What is death?” No trick at all; no silliness. A straightforward question worthy of the attention of a wise one. An old one. And if the old and wise who have lived life and faced death cannot describe either, who can?
But she does not; she keeps her secret; her good opinion of herself; her gnomic pronouncements; her art without commitment. She keeps her distance, enforces it and retreats into the singularity of isolation, in sophisticated, privileged space.
Nothing, no word follows her declaration of transfer. That silence is deep, deeper than the meaning available in the words she has spoken. It shivers, this silence, and the children, annoyed, fill it with language invented on the spot.
“Is there no speech,” they ask her, “no words you can give us that helps us break through your dossier of failures? Through the education you have just given us that is no education at all because we are paying close attention to what you have done as well as to what you have said? To the barrier you have erected between generosity and wisdom?
“We have no bird in our hands, living or dead. We have only you and our important question. Is the nothing in our hands something you could not bear to contemplate, to even guess? Don’t you remember being young when language was magic without meaning? When what you could say, could not mean? When the invisible was what imagination strove to see? When questions and demands for answers burned so brightly you trembled with fury at not knowing?
“Do we have to begin consciousness with a battle heroines and heroes like you have already fought and lost leaving us with nothing in our hands except what you have imagined is there? Your answer is artful, but its artfulness embarrasses us and ought to embarrass you. Your answer is indecent in its self-congratulation. A made-for-television script that makes no sense if there is nothing in our hands.
“Why didn’t you reach out, touch us with your soft fingers, delay the sound bite, the lesson, until you knew who we were? Did you so despise our trick, our modus operandi you could not see that we were baffled about how to get your attention? We are young. Unripe. We have heard all our short lives that we have to be responsible. What could that possibly mean in the catastrophe this world has become; where, as a poet said, “nothing needs to be exposed since it is already barefaced.” Our inheritance is an affront. You want us to have your old, blank eyes and see only cruelty and mediocrity. Do you think we are stupid enough to perjure ourselves again and again with the fiction of nationhood? How dare you talk to us of duty when we stand waist deep in the toxin of your past?
“You trivialize us and trivialize the bird that is not in our hands. Is there no context for our lives? No song, no literature, no poem full of vitamins, no history connected to experience that you can pass along to help us start strong? You are an adult. The old one, the wise one. Stop thinking about saving your face. Think of our lives and tell us your particularized world. Make up a story. Narrative is radical, creating us at the very moment it is being created. We will not blame you if your reach exceeds your grasp; if love so ignites your words they go down in flames and nothing is left but their scald. Or if, with the reticence of a surgeon’s hands, your words suture only the places where blood might flow. We know you can never do it properly – once and for all. Passion is never enough; neither is skill. But try. For our sake and yours forget your name in the street; tell us what the world has been to you in the dark places and in the light. Don’t tell us what to believe, what to fear. Show us belief s wide skirt and the stitch that unravels fear’s caul. You, old woman, blessed with blindness, can speak the language that tells us what only language can: how to see without pictures. Language alone protects us from the scariness of things with no names. Language alone is meditation.
“Tell us what it is to be a woman so that we may know what it is to be a man. What moves at the margin. What it is to have no home in this place. To be set adrift from the one you knew. What it is to live at the edge of towns that cannot bear your company.
“Tell us about ships turned away from shorelines at Easter, placenta in a field. Tell us about a wagonload of slaves, how they sang so softly their breath was indistinguishable from the falling snow. How they knew from the hunch of the nearest shoulder that the next stop would be their last. How, with hands prayered in their sex, they thought of heat, then sun. Lifting their faces as though it was there for the taking. Turning as though there for the taking. They stop at an inn. The driver and his mate go in with the lamp leaving them humming in the dark. The horse’s void steams into the snow beneath its hooves and its hiss and melt are the envy of the freezing slaves.
“The inn door opens: a girl and a boy step away from its light. They climb into the wagon bed. The boy will have a gun in three years, but now he carries a lamp and a jug of warm cider. They pass it from mouth to mouth. The girl offers bread, pieces of meat and something more: a glance into the eyes of the one she serves. One helping for each man, two for each woman. And a look. They look back. The next stop will be their last. But not this one. This one is warmed.”
It’s quiet again when the children finish speaking, until the woman breaks into the silence.
“Finally”, she says, “I trust you now. I trust you with the bird that is not in your hands because you have truly caught it. Look. How lovely it is, this thing we have done – together.”
Name_________________________________________________________________________
Toni Morrison Nobel Prize Lecture Questions
Directions: After you finish reading, write a written response to the lecture by answering the guiding questions. Be sure to cite evidence by paraphrasing or quoting Morrison’s speech.
- Who is the subject of Morrison’s speech? In other words, what do we know about her throught the speaker’s narration?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- What does the old woman’s blindness symbolize?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- What do the younger women symbolize?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- What does the old woman mean when she says to the younger women, “I don’t know whether the bird you are holding is dead or alive, but what I do know is that it is in your hands. It is in your hands.”?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- What is the central theme of the old, blind woman’s proclamation to the young women?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- What are the young women’s responses to the old woman’s declaration? Why are their respective responses ironic?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- How does the interaction between the old woman and the younger women reflect Morrison’s notion of the New Woman?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Look back at your annotations and select a brief passage that struck you in the reading. Copy the excerpt here and provide a brief response to your selection explaining why it is significant to you.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Lesson Two: About the Mississippi Delta Region
Student Learning Objective: Students will be able to identify main ideas from the Mississippi Delta region videos in order to better understand the context for reading Jesmyn Ward’s Men We Reaped.
Essential Questions- What knowledge have you acquired about the Missisippi Delta region of the United States of America?
Lesson Duration: One 45-minute class period
Materials: videos, handouts, chart paper, markers
Step 1 (Warm Up): Please complete the first column of the KWLQ chart (Column “K”) by writing down what you know about the Mississippi Delta. Please be prepared to share at least ONE thing that you wrote.
Step 2: After sharing ONE thing you wrote in the “K” column, Then write down at least 2 things in the “W ” column of the KWLQ chart.
Step 3: Watch the videos about the Mississippi Delta Region.
Video One
Video Two
Video Three
Step 4: Complete the “L” and “Q” columns of the KWLQ chart.
Step 5: As a whole group/class, identify and capture the major/recurrent “Big Ideas” that surfaced in the videos. After generating this list, write one “Big Idea” on a sheet of chart paper then hang each sheet on a designated space on the classroom wall to use in future lessons while reading Men We Reaped.
Name_________________________________________________________________________
KWLQ Chart
K |
W |
L |
Q |
What I already know about the Mississippi Delta Region. |
What I already want to know about the Mississippi Delta Region. |
What I learned about the Mississippi Delta Region. |
Questions I still have about the Mississippi Delta Region. |
|
|
|
|
Lesson Three: Language and Agency in Jesmyn Ward’s Essays
Student Learning Objective: Students will be able to analyze a nonfiction text as a result of writing a well structured paragraph.
Lesson Duration: One 4-minute class period
Materials: Copies of essays by Jesmyn Ward, MEAEAL Paragraph template
Essay One
Essay Two
Essay Three
Step 1: Divide students into equal rows of six to the greatest extent possible.
Step 2: Assign each row one of the articles to read so that each row is reading only one article.
Step 3: Recreate groups so that one student reads each essay into groups of 3 to share the ideas conveyed in the essay each of them read in a small group discussion (jigsaw activity).
Step 4: Write a MEAEAL paragraph that responds to the question: Does the essay you read or the essays discussed in your small groups by Jesmyn Ward relate to Morrison’s Nobel Lecture? Please explain your answer and cite evidence from the text.
Name________________________________________________________________________
M.E.A.E.A.L. Paragraph Template
Directions: Use the template below to write a M.E.A.E.A.L. paragraph about one or more of Ward’s essays and how its themes connect to the points made in Morrison’s Nobel Prize Lecture.
Main Idea Sentence
|
Evidence (an integrated direct or paraphrased quote from the text)
|
Analysis Sentence (explains your perspective on the evidence)
|
Evidence (an integrated direct or paraphrased quote from the text)
|
Analysis Sentence (explains your perspective on the evidence)
|
Link Sentence (connects the ideas conveyed in the paragraph to the larger world or another work)
|
Lesson Four: Reading Men We Reaped
Student Learning Objectives: Students will be able to read and interpret nonfiction texts as a result of engaging in small group discussions.
Lesson Duration: Varies according to chapters being read in or out of class.
Materials: Reader Response Journal, “Big Ideas” charts, copies of Men We Reaped, Reading
Circles handout (multiple copies), markers
*Readings can be completed in class or at home with reading circles being run until the book is completed.
Name_________________________________________________________________________
Reading Circle Role Sheet
Summarizer-Your job is to summarize the reading for today. Please be ready to read the brief summary that you prepared at the beginning of your group meeting.
Summary
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Key Points
1.____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
2.____________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
3.____________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
4.____________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Discussion Director
Discussion Director-For this role you will develop a list of 4-5 questions to guide the group in discussing today’s reading. You will also take care to make sure that each group member has a chance to participate in the discussion.
Discussion Question 1
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Discussion Question 2
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Discussion Question 3
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Discussion Question 4
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Discussion Question 5
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Connector
Directions: Your role for today’s reading is to make connections to the outside world or other texts studied in this unit. Please be sure to make at least ONE connection to the essays that we read by the author as well as ONE connection to the ideas conveyed in Morrison’s Nobel Prize lecture. Other connections can be to other others, events, etc.
Connection 1
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Connection 2
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Connection 3
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Connection 4
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Word Master
Directions: Your role is to identify 5 words or phrases from today’s reading and explain the meaning of these words or phrases and why these selected words or phrases are significant to the reading. Be sure to write the selected word/phrase on the line along with the rationale for your selection.
Word/Phrase 1
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Word/Phrase 2
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Word/Phrase 3
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Word/Phrase 4
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Word/Phrase 5
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Passage Person
Directions: Your role for today’s reading is to identify at least THREE significant passages from the reading and share them with the group. Then pose 1-2 questions about each passage to discuss with the group.
Passage 1
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Question
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Passage 2
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Question
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Passage 3
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Question
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Culture Collector
Directions: Your role is to compare and contrast the culture–language, speech, style of dress, cuisine, dance, belief systems, etc–in the story and your own culture. Select THREE cultural references from the reading that demonstrates similarities and differences.
Cultural Connection 1
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Cultural Connection 2
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Cultural Connection 3
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Name___________________________________________________________________
Reader Response Journal
Directions: For this reading assignment you will keep a Reader Response Journal. The purpose of this task is to capture your ideas and thoughts about the text you are reading. Here are some ideas to consider for completing your Reader Response journal entries.
As you read, identify excerpts from the text and note them in the box on the left. Then write a reaction to what the text says. As you read, identify a particular character or characters that speak to you in the reading and write a response to that particular character’s thoughts, words or actions.
Passage One |
Response One |
|
|
Passage Two |
Response Two |
|
|
Lesson Five: A Snapshot of Puerto Rican Culture
Student Learning Objectives: Students will be able to understand and identify aspects of Puerto Rican culture in order to increase their comprehension of Quiara Alegria Hudes’ memoir My Broken Language.
Lesson Duration: One 45- minute class period
Materials: videos, article, chart paper, markers, Post-It notes
What are the Orisha? Why are they important to Puerto Rican culture? How is the practice of this traditional belief system an act of resistance? What is Bomba and why does its origin and expression represent resistance?
Step 1: As a whole group, the class will view this short video on the roots of Orisha found here.
Step 2: Separate students into even groups to investigate texts and videos on selected aspects of Puerto Rican culture. Each designated group should use the links below. Each group will take notes on the major themes of their investigation.
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
Group 4
Group 5
Group 6
Group 7
Step 3: Allow students to share the main ideas from each video watched or text read in discussion by allowing them to create a main ideas chart on chart paper. Post the chart paper created by each group at various places in the classroom. Then allow each group 1-2 minutes to visit each poster to read what their classmates have captured (gallery walk). Allow students comment, respond to or question the information contained in the charts by writing their thoughts on Post-It notes. Keep the charts up for the duration of reading Quiara Alegria Hudes’ My Broken Language. These charts can be revisited and revised as needed in future lessons.
Lesson Six: Language, Agency and Power in the Essays of Quiara Alegria Hudes
Student Learning Objective: Students will be able to analyze a nonfiction text as a result of writing a well structured paragraph.
Lesson Duration:One 45-minute class period
Materials: M.E.A.E.A.L. paragraph template, copies of the essays, chart paper, markers
Essay One
Essay Two
Essay Three
Step 1: Separate students into even rows or groups
Step 2: Assign each group ONE of Hudes’ essays.
Step 3: Regroup students to share the main ideas from each essay read in a small group discussion.
Step 4: Capture the themes of the reading on chart paper then post them around the room for reference later.
Step 5: Write a M.E.A.E.A.L. paragraph that explains how Hudes’ work as an artist connects to the ideas related in Morrison’s Nobel Prize lecture. Please cite evidence from the texts that support your response.
Name_________________________________________________________________________
M.E.A.E.A.L. Paragraph Template
Directions: Use the template below to write a M.E.A.E.A.L. paragraph about one or more of Ward’s essays and how its themes connect to the points made in Morrison’s Nobel Prize Lecture.
Main Idea Sentence
|
Evidence (an integrated direct or paraphrased quote from the text)
|
Analysis Sentence (explains your perspective on the evidence)
|
Evidence (an integrated direct or paraphrased quote from the text)
|
Analysis Sentence (explains your perspective on the evidence)
|
Link Sentence (connects the ideas conveyed in the paragraph to the larger world or another work)
|
Lesson Seven-Reading My Broken Language
Student Learning Objective: Students will be able to read and interpret nonfiction texts as a result of engaging in small group discussions.
Lesson Duration: Varies according to chapters being read in or out of class.
Materials: Reader Response Journal, “Big Ideas” charts, copies of My Broken Language, Reading Circles handout (see appendix), markers
*Readings can be completed in class or at home with reading circles being run until the book is completed.
Name_________________________________________________________________________
Reading Circle Role Sheet
Summarizer-Your job is to summarize the reading for today. Please be ready to read the brief summary that you prepared at the beginning of your group meeting.
Summary
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Key Points
1.____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
2.___________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
3.____________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
4.____________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Discussion Director
Discussion Director-For this role you will develop a list of 4-5 questions to guide the group in discussing today’s reading. You will also take care to make sure that each group member has a chance to participate in the discussion.
Discussion Question 1
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Discussion Question 2
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Discussion Question 3
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Discussion Question 4
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Discussion Question 5
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Connector
Directions: Your role for today’s reading is to make connections to the outside world or other texts studied in this unit. Please be sure to make at least ONE connection to the essays that we read by the author as well as ONE connection to the ideas conveyed in Morrison’s Nobel Prize lecture. Other connections can be to other others, events, etc.
Connection 1
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Connection 2
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Connection 3
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Connection 4
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Word Master
Directions: Your role is to identify 5 words or phrases from today’s reading and explain the meaning of these words or phrases and why these selected words or phrases are significant to the reading. Be sure to write the selected word/phrase on the line along with the rationale for your selection.
Word/Phrase 1
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Word/Phrase 2
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Word/Phrase 3
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Word/Phrase 4
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Word/Phrase 5
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Passage Person
Directions: Your role for today’s reading is to identify at least THREE significant passages from the reading and share them with the group. Then pose 1-2 questions about each passage to discuss with the group.
Passage 1
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Question
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Passage 2
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Question
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Passage 3
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Question
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Culture Collector
Directions: Your role is to compare and contrast the culture–language, speech, style of dress, cuisine, dance, belief systems, etc–in the story and your own culture. Select THREE cultural references from the reading that demonstrates similarities and differences.
Cultural Connection 1
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Cultural Connection 2
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Cultural Connection 3
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Reader Response Journal
Directions: For this reading assignment you will keep a Reader Response Journal. The purpose of this task is to capture your ideas and thoughts about the text you are reading. Here are some ideas to consider for completing your Reader Response journal entries.
As you read, identify excerpts from the text and note them in the box on the left. Then write a reaction to what the text says. As you read, identify a particular character or characters that speak to you in the reading and write a response to that particular character’s thoughts, words or actions.
Passage One |
Response One |
|
|
Passage Two |
Response Two |
|
|
Lesson Eight-Is it a Memoir? Write a Six-Word Memoir
Student Learning Objective: Students will be able to identify the criteria for memoir and practice the self reflection that is the genre by creating a six-word memoir.
Essential Question-What constitutes a memoir? What are its main components?
Whole Group Video 1
Whole Group Video 2
Whole Group Video 3
Whole Group Video 4
Name________________________________________________________________________
Directions: Please complete the following steps to creating your six-word memoir. Please use the videos to help guide this practice. I am not looking for perfection but thoughtfulness about the information given in the videos to help you better understand what a memoir is.
Write 40 words that describe you (I will count so make it 40!!). Who are you? What are you good at? What do you want to be good at? What are your vices (struggles)? What are your virtues (strengths)?
Using your list of 40, write a 20-word story about yourself (Again, I will count).
Reduce your 20-word story to 6 words. That six-word memoir should still reflect your central message or theme.
The culminating activities for this unit will be for students to write their own memoirs as well as write a literary analysis of one of the memoirs.
Lesson Nine: Writing a Mini Memoir
The collection in whole should have a distinct title. Students should complete 5-7 sections as part of the collection. Each chapter should have a distinct title. Sections of the student memoirs can be developed using teacher-directed or student-selected topics. Section topics can be person, event or concept-centered. Some potential topics students could write about are:
- Neighborhood or a particular point of origin
- Identity
- Love
- Friendship
- Family member(s)/lineage
- Spirituality
Once students have selected their subjects to write about, students can create a timeline of the events that they wish to communicate to their readers in order to help organize/plan their writing. Students could also turn their memoirs into media projects using video applications/sites to turn their memoirs into mini films/media pieces Making Videos in Google Slides.
Memoir Timeline Worksheet
Directions: Use this timeline worksheet to identify the events that you plan to write about in your memoir. Write a brief description of the event. Please add additional spaces if necessary.
Where it all begins…
Next stage begins here…
My journey continues when…
My life continued changing because…
Reflections on where I have been and where I aim to be…
Memoir Rubric
Name_________________________________________________________________
In addition to what is outlined in the rubric, all sections of your memoir need:
*a title (a title for each subsection and the collection itself)
*be double spaced
* written in 12 point, Arial or Times New Roman font
Structure -Events before
Structure – Events after |
Author clearly “shows” attitudes and feelings numerous times through the thoughts, action and dialogue of the characters.
The memoir clearly “shows” how the learning changed the author’s life. |
Author’s attitudes and feelings before are evident & occur numerous times through the thoughts and actions of the character.
Although word choice does not always “show”, it is clear to the reader how the learning changed the author’s life. |
Direct statements indicate the author’s feelings and attitudes and/or some events are not necessarily significant.
Change is evident; but is “told” to the reader through direct statements. |
Memoir includes irrelevant events that cause the reader confusion in trying to determine the before feelings and attitudes.
Memoir includes irrelevant events that cause confusion when noticing the change in the author’s life. |
Style & Technique |
Author consistently “shows” the significance of the events through engaging details i.e figurative language, compelling language, and a balance of action, thoughts, and dialogue. |
Author sometimes “shows” the significance of the events through details, compelling language, and a balance of action, thoughts, and dialogue. |
Author “tells” the significance of the events through direct statements. |
No effort is made to reveal the significance of the events to the reader. |
Format |
There is a main character for the reader to follow and connect with
The story has a central focus. Details and information deal with the main theme.
|
There is a main character but the reader feels little connection to them
The story has a general focus but contains unnecessary details or information
|
Difficult to identify the main character.
The story contains large amounts of unnecessary information.
|
There is not a main character or the use of first-person voice.
No main focus or theme.
|
Conventions |
Memoir is error-free.
The collection has a creative and astutely selected title as does each section of the memoir. |
Memoir contains minimal mistakes that do not interfere with meaning.
The collection has a creative title as does each section of the memoir. |
Numerous minor errors often make memoir difficult to read.
The collection has a title that is generally connected to the writer’s subject matter as does each section of the memoir. |
Many errors in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation often interfere with meaning.
The collection is missing a title or a section of the memoir remains untitled. |
Memorable Moment |
Memoir focuses on a single moment that seems significant to the author’s life.
|
Memoir focuses on a single moment that seems kind of significant to the author’s life. |
Memoir focuses on a single moment that does not seem significant to the author’s life. |
Author does not seem to be aware of the significance of the moment. |
Score:
Lesson Ten: Writing a Literary Analysis
For this assignment students will write a literary analysis of one or both memoirs read in this unit. Students should draw on the “Big Ideas” charts for each book, Men We Reaped and My Broken Language, as well as the mentor text for the unit and the essays read by Ward and Hudes. The MEAEAL paragraphs written in Lessons Three and Six.
Analytical Essay Rubric
Criteria |
Exceeds Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Approaching Expectations |
Below Expectations |
Does Not Meet Expectations |
Introduction Paragraph
|
Original hook engages the reader’s curiosity
Background info is relevant; clearly develops into thesis
Thesis/claim is strong clearly stated; correct location
|
Hook is somewhat interesting
Background info is relevant; partially develops into thesis
Thesis/claim is stated in the correct location
|
Hook restates the prompt; unoriginal
Background info leaves reader with questions
Thesis/claim is evident but is not in the incorrect location
|
Hook does not engage the reader
Background info is
missing important
topics for clarity
Thesis/claim is confusing and in the incorrect location
|
Hook missing
Back- ground info missing
Thesis missing
|
Organization & Transitions
|
Ideas are coherently organized into separate body paragraphs; topic sentences are complete
Transitions are used correctly/sufficiently; essay flows logica
|
Ideas are somewhat organized into separate body paragraphs; topic sentences are complete
Transitions are used correctly at the beginning of each body paragraph & conclusion; sometimes used within body paragraphs
|
Ideas do not begin and end when they should; topic sentences are incomplete or are in incorrect locations
Missing 1 body paragraph or conclusion transition; occasionally used within body paragraphs
|
Ideas are disorganized; topic sentences do not control the paragraph
Missing 2+ body paragraph or conclusion transitions; rarely used within body paragraphs; lacks flow
|
Paragraphing is not used
Transitions are not used
|
Conclusion Paragraph
|
Conclusion stays on topic; provides closure.
|
Conclusion mostly stays on topic; somewhat provides closure. |
Conclusion strays from topic.
|
Conclusion excessively strays from topic.
|
Conclusion is missing.
|
Evidence & Elaboration
|
All evidence is relevant & clearly connects to the thesis
All evidence is cited correctly; minimum # sources present; plagiarism is not present
All explanation & elaboration sentences clarify and extend ideas; context is present
|
Most evidence is relevant and connects to the thesis
Some citation mistakes exist; minimum # sources present; plagiarism is not present
Most explanation & elaboration sentences clarify and extend ideas; context is mostly present
|
Missing 1 piece of evidence or half are irrelevant
Major citation issues exist or missing a required source; plagiarism is not present
Explanation & elaboration sentences clarify but do not extend ideas; context is sometimes present
|
Missing 2+ pieces of evidence or 3+ pieces of evidence are irrelevant
Evidence is cited incorrectly or some plagiarism is present
Explanation & elaboration sentences are insufficient; context is rarely or not present
|
Evidence is missing
Citations are missing; ample plagiarism
E/E missing or mostly missing
|
Tone, Word Choice, & Conventions
|
Tone is formal; no personal pronouns; no slang
Strong words appropriate to stance are used; no repetition of major words
Punctuation, capitalization, spelling, and usage are correct; no or few errors
MLA format is evident and implemented correctly. |
Tone is mostly formal; 1 use of personal pronoun; 1 use of slang
Word choice is mostly appropriate to stance; few repetitions of major words.
Punctuation, capitalization, spelling, and usage are mostly correct; some errors
MLA format is evident and implemented correctly. |
Tone is somewhat formal; 2-3 uses of personal pronouns; 2-3 uses of slang
Word choice is somewhat appropriate to stance; some repetitions of major words
Punctuation, capitalization, spelling, and usage are sometimes correct; several errors
MLA format is evident and implemented almost correctly with 1-2 errors. |
Lacks formality; 4+ uses of personal pronouns; 4+ uses of slang
Word choice is basic and unrelated to stance; several repetitions of major words.
Punctuation, capitalization, spelling, and usage are frequently incorrect; frequent errors
MLA format is evident and implemented almost correctly with 3-4 errors. |
Tone is informal; personal pronouns used throughout.
Word choice is very repetitive.
MLA format is evident and implemented with more than 5 errors. |
Name:
Score: