Author: Sandy O’Keefe
School/Organization:
Rudolph Blankenburg School
Year: 2009
Seminar: American Political Culture
Grade Level: 8-12
Keywords: 8th grade, abolitionists, African American, anti-slavery, Colonial America, end to slavery, Philadelphia, Quakers
School Subject(s): African American History, American History, History, Political Science, Social Studies
This curriculum unit will explore the work of the early abolitionists in Colonial America, specifically in Philadelphia. The unit, designed for an 8th grade class but adaptable to different grade levels, will examine the work of the early forerunners who advocated for an end to slavery—both the trade and slavery itself. The unit will first deal with the Quakers who are credited with leading the movement, and then the unit will also discuss the groups led by African Americans, as well as other white groups. The anti-slavery Quakers were originally met with resistance from Quaker leadership. As many of them spoke up for the rights of all people, they jeopardized their own situations, but their work eventually changed many opinions.
This curriculum unit and lesson plans will allow students to study the work and impact of the early anti-slavery Quakers. The unit will include the names of George Keith, Ralph Sandiford, Benjamin Lay, John Woolman, Anthony Benezet, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Lundy, William Still and James Forten, plus others. The early movement and efforts towards anti-slavery that occurred in Philadelphia are the main focus of this unit.
Download Unit: OKeefe-2.pdf
Did you try this unit in your classroom? Give us your feedback here.
Eighth grade students in the Philadelphia School District take a course in American history. Students study the time period from the first explorers of the new world to modern time. Students learn about the origins of slavery, and that it took a civil war to end it. Students study every war America was involved with, but they do not study the political groups who advocated for those with few or no rights. Their impact on America is noteworthy and should be studied by students. The names Frederick Douglass, William Lloyd Garrison, Sojourner Truth and Harriet Tubman are mentioned in a minimal paragraph each in school textbooks. Though this unit will not go into their specific contributions, this treatment shows that not enough time is spent teaching students on how the anti-slavery movement began. There is a need for students to study the people and groups who were the forerunners and laid the groundwork for the anti-slavery movement. It is critical that students learn about the groups and individuals who made such an impact on America. By 1690, when Quakers, such as George Keith began protesting the African slave trade, there were fewer than 2000 blacks in the northern colonies; but thirty years later, the population of blacks grew to 14,000. By the 1770s, blacks made up about five percent of the population, their numbers growing to 50,000. At this time, in Pennsylvania, a major Quaker settlement, there was a workforce that was 25 percent slave.1 By 1790, the slave population of the entire United States was just under 700,000.2 Even though slavery grew in Quaker settlements, Quakers are given credit for leading the anti-slavery movement with their arguments, publications, and denunciations of slavery. Some Quakers were major participants of the institution as slave owners and slave traders.3 William Penn even owned slaves and believed that owning slaves was a way to economic growth for Pennsylvania. George Fox, founder of the Society of Friends, wrote in 1657 an epistle urging Quakers to bring God’s “glad tidings to every captivated creature under the whole heaven.”4 All men, he argued are equal in God’s sight. In 1688, founders of Germantown asked the Philadelphia Quarterly and Yearly Meetings how the “traffick of mens-body” could fit within Quaker beliefs. If slavery was good, “what can we say is…evil?”5 George Keith published and circulated the first anti-slavery protest in the colonies five years afterwards. In his pamphlet, An Exhortation & Caution to Friends Concerning Buying or Keeping of Negroes, he wrote that slavery violated the Golden Rule and that Negroes were “a real part of mankind.” 6 Despite these protests and pamphlets, the members of the Philadelphia Meetings decided to ignore these appeals. The initial protests mentioned were met with silencing and discipline from Quaker leadership. Quakers believed in unity first and foremost and if some were pro-slavery and some were anti-slavery, this would threaten community unity. In the late 1720s more anti-slavery views came forward, despite the potential punishments that would ensue for those who spoke against slavery. One anti-slavery proponent, Ralph Sandiford, was forced to leave Philadelphia and the Quakers for publishing his work A Brief Examination of the Practice of the Times. He stated that slavery was a “…tyrannical oppression that hell has invented on this globe.”7 In 1738, another controversial advocate, Benjamin Lay, went to extreme measures, standing outside in the snow with one leg bare, stating “you pretend compassion for me, but you do not feel for the poor slaves in your fields, who go all winter half clad.”8 This was one of his many extreme measures but it was his speech, combined with his dramatics of stabbing a bladder filled with berry juice with a sword while wearing a military uniform at the Philadelphia Yearly Meeting in 1738, that had him banned from the Society of Friends.9 Though these initial protests, along with others, were seen as a threat to unity and both Sandiford and Lay were met with discipline for speaking out against slavery in this way, this would change by the 1750s. By the 1750s, more Quakers were speaking out at the Monthly and Yearly Meetings against slavery. There was a desire to return to a more simple way of life and to purify themselves of their sins of buying, trading and owning slaves. More favorably received than Sandiford and Lay, John Woolman gained Friends and support with his speeches and writings. 10 Woolman wrote in Considerations on the Keeping of Negroes in 1753, “let us…consider what we should think and how we should feel were we in their circumstances.” His words were widely published at Yearly Meetings. He believed that if slavery were not eradicated, the consequences for the sin would fall on not only the individual but also the society that allowed it to continue. By stressing concern for the community, he had found the balance between respecting Quaker unity and moving forward in promoting his beliefs on abolishing slavery.11 In 1755, the Philadelphia Yearly Meeting ordered that those who were buying slaves be reported so that they could be disciplined and possibly even disowned. Now, the debate was moving forward— slave owners claimed this was causing disunity among their group, while anti-slavery supporters, such as Woolman, believed it was self-interest motivating the slave owners to continue their bad habit.12 The Philadelphia Yearly Meeting spoke against slavery clearly in 1758, and by 1765, the Philadelphia Yearly Meeting supported the immediate emancipation of slaves—freedom was a natural right.13 Still, the Quakers had guilt for their sins. Another Quaker—this one a convert—Anthony Benezet, influenced Quakers in his pamphlets as well. He believed in a gradual solution, like most did prior to the 1830s. He believed slaves should be freed after they worked off their sale price. He believed the institution of slavery also harmed whites, stating it led to “idelness, discourage[d] marriages, corrupt[ed] the youth and ruin[ed] and debauche[d] Morals.”14 His work was widely published and he wrote to politicians across America and monarchs in Europe. In 1770, Benezet led the Society of Friends in Philadelphia to organize schools where free blacks could receive a basic education.15 His death in 1784 was mourned by hundreds of black Philadelphians.16 Benjamin Lundy was from New Jersey and was a Quaker abolitionist. He devoted the majority of his life trying to protect fugitive slaves and publishing papers in opposition to the expansion of slavery. He retired from his abolitionist work in 1838 and was ready to move back with his family to Illinois. Unfortunately, he did not do so before all his belongings stored at the Philadelphia Hall burned in a fire.17 The Hall was burned to the ground a few days after it had held an interracia lmeeting of anti-slavery supporters. The Society for the Relief of Free Negroes Held in Bondage in Philadelphia was formed in 1775.18 The documents produced predominantly by members from the Society of Friends led the anti-slavery movement. Quakers dominated this society originally, but it expanded soon after to become “The Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery and for the Relief of Free Negroes Unlawfully Held in Bondage and for Improving the condition of the African Race.”19 The impact of the writings of the Quakers led the Philadelphia Quakers to disown slaveholders. Among the Society of Friends, slave owning itself became a matter for disciplinary action beginning in 1776. The Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of 1776 officially took the steps to disown those Friends who did not manumit their slaves. 20 In 1780, Pennsylvania abolished slavery, no doubt in major part due to the work of Quakers.21 The Philadelphia Monthly Meeting reported there were not any more slave owners by 1783.22 By 1787, there were not any Quakers north of Virginia who owned slaves.23 The Pennsylvania Abolition Society was the first organized antislavery group and it focused on improving the lives of blacks, whether slave or free. The first meeting of the Society began on April 14, 1775. The number of men who met was few and the consistency of members was nonexistent. Furthermore, the number of times the group met was erratic due to the revolutionary events going on in America during this time. It was not until 1787 that the Society gained stability and strength in numbers.24 Benjamin Franklin became the president of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society in 1787.25 In 1789, there was a change in the organization of the PAS. A committee on correspondence was formed and when the PAS first began corresponding with other abolition societies from other states, there were forty-two individual members, many from states surrounding Pennsylvania. The PAS members aided the free blacks who had earned freedom through the state’s 1780 gradual abolition act. They kept a record of the free blacks who would become free through indentured servitude. The society also helped to protect those blacks from being kidnapped and sold back into slavery. They appointed committees to investigate and prosecute those who did not follow the state laws regarding kidnapping. They petitioned the state government to set fines for those who kidnapped free blacks. Due to their consistent correspondence and advocacy, the Pennsylvania legislature passed laws to aid free blacks. These laws also influenced other free states to pass similar laws protecting all free blacks.26 The PAS wrote many petitions to Congress, but in one particular statement they wrote that God created all men and that all are “alike objects of his care and equally designed for the enjoyment of Happiness.” Furthermore, the document stated: “Equal Liberty was originally the portion and is still the birthright of all men, and influenced by the strong ties of humanity and the principles of their institution, your Memorialists conceive themselves bound to use all justifiable endeavors, to loosen the Bands of Slavery and promote a general enjoyment of the blessings of Freedom.”27 The PAS supported the abolition of slavery everywhere. They were concerned about the spread of slavery into territories of the United States. The PAS petitioned for slavery to not be expanded anywhere. The PAS unified and encouraged other abolition societies to organize and continue in the work they started. Because of their helpfulness to other societies, as well as their strong Quaker center, Philadelphia was chosen as a central meeting location for all abolition societies to come together. The first formal meeting of all the abolition societies at this time was held from January 1-8, 1794 in the Philadelphia City Hall.28 This meeting of the abolitionist societies came to be called the American Convention. At this time, Philadelphia was home to the national government, so it made sense that the American Convention took place there. The American Convention was held due in large part to the PAS. If it were not for the PAS’s contact with other abolition societies, the American Conventions would not have taken place. Some believed the national abolitionist meeting should be held in the nation’s capital. When the nation’s capital was relocated, so was the meeting place of the American Convention. But the American Convention never met again after the meeting location changed. It is not clear if the cause for this was that the meeting was moved to D.C., away from the care of the PAS, or if the slave holding District of Columbia was too hostile an environment to allow a meeting such as this to take place.29 The PAS also led a boycott of slave-produced goods.30 While holding the American Convention, the antislavery leaders discussed the importance of only purchasing free goods. The Free Produce Society of Pennsylvania began on January 8, 1827. The organizations shared the same meeting place, but the PAS was not very involved in promoting the idea of only purchasing goods made by free labor.31 The PAS along with the American Convention ran an organized abolitionist movement during the years 1775 to 1830. Research says that the PAS could have formed a more effective partnership with blacks. The PAS did not elect a black member until decades after the other abolition societies did. But it should be noted that the PAS did support black leadership and accomplishments within the black community.32 Many of the people who worked for one abolitionist organization typically worked for other organizations. There were several members of the Philadelphia American Anti-slavery Society who also were in the Philadelphia Female Anti-slavery Society.33 The first meeting of the AASS took place in Catherine McDermot’s schoolroom in Philadelphia. They adopted a firm belief that slavery and prejudice were contrary to the laws of God and the Declaration of Independence. Many of the members were African American. Many were also women. Members included Charlotte Forten and her three daughters, Harriett D. Purvis, Sarah Louise Forten and Margaretta Forten. Grace Douglass, Mary Woods, Lydia White, Margaret Bowser, and Sarah McCrummel also signed the charter; Sarah Mapps Douglas joined the organization shortly after. Douglass and Forten worked with Lucretia Mott and others to raise money to work towards emancipation. When the Civil War ended, the society believed their work was finished. The members met in 1870 and agreed that they could disband since they had achieved their goals of emancipation.34 The Philadelphia Female Anti- Slavery Society (PFASS) was founded in 1833, but one year prior to this organization, a group of black women in Philadelphia formed the Female Literary Association for the “mental improvement of females.” Women would gather and discuss antislavery methods, but mainly they met to educate one another and improve their own minds. In these meetings, it was a common view that black women could help others better if they themselves were educated.35 Benjamin Lundy believed this was a positive initiative, as did William Lloyd Garrison—it was this type of organization that would improve the lives of those involved and those they helped. 36 Black women played a large role in the formation of the PFASS. The constitution for this group was presented in December 1833 and of the eighteen women who signed it, at least seven were black.37 Many black women who were members of this society participated in activities to aid fugitive slaves. They sought to clothe, shelter and feed the runaways. It was women in general that were involved in this service and mainly the women who did this were associated with the church.38 It was reported that in Philadelphia in 1795, most black women worked as laundresses—and forty years later, this had not changed. It was a common occupation for black women to work as washer-women, needle women, seamstresses, cooks, and live-in servants for families. The African American women typically had to work all day and earn a wage and then come home and continue with their own domestic work.39 Black women fought other moral crusades in their communities as well. They fought hard against prostitution and immorality—and the most famous for this was Hetty Reckless of Philadelphia, who was also a member of the PFASS.40 Reckless served as the link between society and the black community. She was adamant that the organization support her anti-prostitution boarding house, and they did.41 There were several notable women who took leadership roles in the biracial PFASS organization. Among the notable African American women were the Fortens: Charlotte Forten, the mother and her daughters, Margaretta, Harriet and Sarah. They often hosted other abolitionist families in their home and worked on the social crusades. The daughters Sarah and Margaretta Forten worked for the anti-slavery press and were teachers. The daughter Harriet Forten Purvis, after marriage, also followed in her mother’s footsteps. Another notable family with key women abolitionists included the Shadds. Mary Ann Shadd of West Chester, Pennsylvania worked as a teacher and fervent abolitionist. She moved to Canada eventually and became a visible, outspoken writer, lecturer and emigrationist, but she perhaps was too alienating to male abolitionists because of her strong beliefs.42 Regardless, because of the Fortens’ and Shadds’ social positions, these two families were not typical abolitionists—most were not as well to do as these two families.43 Another notable woman on the abolitionist crusade was Sarah Douglass, who taught young black women in Philadelphia about “morals and manners.” She focused on training and preparing teachers in Philadelphia, and also she trained young women from the best families in the black community. Sarah was closely connected with the PFASS. Many teachers connected with religious organizations and antislavery societies for financial support. Though she wanted independence from the organization to run her school as she desired, it was due to the financial support of the PFASS and the PAS that her school was able to stay up and running.44 The society also supported her by paying her rental fees for her school and by purchasing items she needed. She was recognized after her death as being a pioneer of education among the people of Philadelphia.45 The PFASS did not face a formal division among its members, even when other societies were splitting over disagreements about Garrison’s views on how to end slavery in the late 1840s. They supported him because most of the women in the society were Quakers and believed political inequality was a sin and immoral. 46 This may have changed among some because Sarah Douglass organized the all-black Women’s Association of Philadelphia, which would “support Frederick Douglass’s cry for black nationalism.”47 Still, the society put their support behind Garrison. The society also supported the movement to help women gain the right to vote. Philadelphia’s Pennsylvania Hall was burned to the ground shortly after it opened in May 1838. The Hall had held an interracial meeting by an Anti-Slavery Convention of American Women three days prior.48 Despite setbacks, the meetings and the societies went on in their work towards abolitionism. Jane Marie Chester, an African American worked alongside her husband George Chester in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.49 George worked for the Liberator in Harrisburg. Together, they worked to raise twelve children and ran a successful family business, and an activist household. After his death in the 1850s, Jane took over the household and the family business. She continued in the work as an abolitionist. The Stills, William and Letitia, ran a boarding home in Philadelphia which helped connect blacks to the community. Here they could stay at a modest charge and connect with people about employment opportunities, social events and churches.50 William Still’s work and support helped encourage and assist Harriet Tubman to go back into the south to rescue slaves.51 Many men and women formed many organizations that helped better the lives of free African Americans—these groups included self-help organizations, activist groups, charitable organizations and others. The goals of these organizations varied but were related—many were formed to bring about an end to slavery. Economically speaking, white abolitionists were better off than black abolitionists. Joining the abolitionist crusade often helped blacks because whites would offer support to them. The Johnson House was built between 1765 and 1768 by Jacob Knoor (www.johnsonhouse.org). The Johnson family was well known to be abolitionists who worked to end slavery in the United States. They were active in helping freed African Americans find a better way of life. The Johnson’s participated in the American Free Produce Society, which boycotted produce grown with slave labor. They also supported the Home for Infirmed and Aged Colored Persons, the Association of Friends for the Free Instruction of Adult Colored Persons, and the Emlen Institute for the Benefit of children of African and Indian Descent. The three generations of Johnsons who lived in the house during the abolition era were connected with such national figures as William Lloyd Garrison, Oliver Johnson, William Still, Lucretia Mott, Harriet Tubman, and John Greenleaf Whittier. During the 1850’s, the Johnson’s turned their house into an Underground Railroad station. It became a crucial stop-over point. Runaways stayed in the attic, barns, springhouse, and other outbuildings on the property. Since it was illegal to aid runaway slaves, the Johnson’s could have faced fines and even imprisonment if they were caught. The runaways, if caught, would been returned to slavery in Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and other slave states.52 Because of the work of the Johnson family many received the support they needed.The Impact of the Quakers
The Pennsylvania Abolition Society
Philadelphia American Anti-slavery Society (AASS) (1833)
Notable African Americans and Women and the Abolitionist movement (including the Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society)
Johnson House History
The major objective for this curriculum unit is for students to study the early major abolitionists of Philadelphia and Pennsylvania. Students will learn about how these groups fought, organized and petitioned for rights for all men, while facing discrimination. Overall, students will understand the barriers and difficulties facing the abolitionists, whether they were black or white, male or female. Students will understand the role Philadelphia and Pennsylvania had in beginning this movement. As mentioned in the historical context section, the Pennsylvania Abolition Society was the key component to organizing and running the American Convention. It is important to see that this society in Pennsylvania was the one in charge of organizing meetings held at the national level— without their involvement, the meetings at the national level stopped. Thus, students will be able to see the dominant role that Pennsylvania played in the abolitionist movement.
In order to accomplish this unit in the classroom, the teacher must use various strategies. The majority of lessons are designed for cooperative groups within a classroom. The lessons require that the students use listening skills, graphic organizers, group discussion skills, critical thinking skills, and creative and analytical writing skills. Each lesson is designed for an 8th grade classroom and a forty-five minute class period. The unit plan can be adapted accordingly and used for grades 5th through 12th. Because both 5th and 8th graders study American History in the School District of Philadelphia, I feel this unit would be most beneficial for these age groups. 8th grade standards are listed after the lesson plans.
Objectives: Materials: Biographies of Anthony Benezet, Ralph Sandiford, George Keith, Benjamin Franklin, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Lay, Benjamin Lundy, John Woolman, William Still, James Forten, Robert Purvis John Remond, James McCrummell Notes from early meetings and societies including the PAS, PFASS, etc. Introduction: Activity: Conclusion: Extension Activity: Objectives: Materials: Biographies of Anthony Benezet, Ralph Sandiford, George Keith, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Lay, Benjamin Lundy, John Woolman, William Still, James Forten, Robert Purvis, John Remond, James McCrummell, William Still Laptops, Library books, note cards Introduction: The teacher will begin the lesson by reviewing the major points of the first lesson -who were the abolitionists? -what did they do? -what were their methods? -what about their meetings? Activity: Extension Activity: Objectives: Materials: Sample of the notes from the meetings of these groups Introduction: Activity: Extension Activity: Objectives: Materials: Biographies of famous/notable abolitionists who were African American or Women Activity: Extension Activity: Objectives: Activity: Extension Activity:Lesson 1: Introducing the idea of abolitionists: their goals, their ideas, and their methods (2 days—30 to 45 minutes each)
Lesson 2: Abolitionists in Philadelphia: Who were they?
Lesson 3: The Pennsylvania Abolition Society, the American Convention, Philadelphia American Anti-slavery Society, Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society
Lesson 4: Notable African American Abolitionists/Notable Women Abolitionists
Lesson 5: Visit the Johnson House in Germantown, PA (Optional Field Trip)
African American Registry, a Non-Profit Education Organization (www.aaregistry.com) Accessed 6-1-09. This website provides information on specific contributions of African Americans that happened in history. Adams, Alice D. The Neglected Period of Anti-Slavery in America. (Gloucester, Mass: Radcliffe College, 1908). This book provides a study of the period 1808-1831, and it reviews the anti-slavery work that was done during this time period. Bacon, Margaret H. History of the Pennsylvania Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery; the relief of negroes unlawfully held in bondage; and for improving the condition of the African race. (Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Abolition Society, 1959). This book gives a history of the PAS which was founded in 1775. It provides the accomplishments and explains how the group has accomplished some of its goals, but even in 1959, still has not achieved all of its goals. Brendlinger, Irv A. To be Silent…Would be Criminal. The antislavery influence and writings of Anthony Benezet. (Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press, Inc, 2007). The book provides a detailed account of Benezet’s life and how he came to the opinions that he did. The book also contains the writings and letters of Benezet as well as information on those he influenced. Eberly, William, The Pennsylvania Abolition Society, 1775-1830. (Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, 1973. This book documents the contributions of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society. It details the accomplishments and ways that the members advocated for the free blacks in Philadelphia and throughout Pennsylvania. Ferrell, Claudine L. The Abolitionist Movement. (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2006). This book details the politics behind those who fought for the rights of free blacks and provides a great amount of information on the people who were abolitionists. Frost, J. William. The Quaker Origins of Antislavery. (Norwood, PA: Norwood Editions, 1980). This book provides information on the Quaker’s initial response to slavery, the thoughts and writings of key Quaker abolitionists, as well as minutes for the Philadelphia Quaker meetings. Historical Society of Pennsylvania Web Page (www.hsp.org) Accessed 5-1-09. This web page offers several lessons and a lot of information that can be used for teaching about the Pennsylvania Abolition Society and more. Poole, William Frederick. Anti-Slavery Opinions before the year 1800. (Westport, CT: Negro Universities Press, 1970). The book originally published in 1873, provides the reader with the detailed anti-slavery opinions before 1800. Sandiford, Ralph. A Brief Examination of the Practice of the Times. (New York: Arno Press, 1969). This primary source document gives the opinions of the Quaker Ralph Sandiford on the treatment of slaves and why slavery must be abolished. Yee, Shirley J. Black Women Abolitionists. A study in activism, 1828-1860. (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1992). This book describes the role of African American women as abolitionists for the years 1828-1860. Further names and writings for study: George Keith—An Exhortation & Caution to Friends Concerning Buying or Keeping of Negroes, 1693 Ralph Sandiford—A Brief Examination of the Practice of the Times, 1720s Benjamin Lay—All slave-keepers that keep the innocent in bondage, Apostates pretending to lay claim to the pure and holy Christian religion, 1720s John Woolman—Considerations on the Keeping of Negroes, Part 1 and Part 2, 1753, 1762 Anthony Benezet—A Short Account of that Part of Africa Inhabited by Negroes, 1762 Benjamin Lundy—The Origin and True Causes of the Texas Revolution Commenced in the Year, 1835 Benjamin Rush, James Forten, Robert Purvis, John Remond, James McCrummell, William Still Endnotes Anthony Benezet. (Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press, Inc, 2007). p. 3.
1.1. Learning to Read Independently (1.1.8. A, B, C, D, G) Use knowledge of root words as well as context clues and glossaries to understand Identify basic facts and ideas in text using specific strategies (e.g., recall genre characteristics, Demonstrate after reading understanding and interpretation of both fiction and nonfiction text, including public documents. 1.2. Reading Critically in All Content Areas (1.2.8. A, B) Read and understand essential content of informational texts and documents in all academic areas. Use and understand a variety of media and evaluate the quality of material produced. 1.4. Types of Writing (1.4.8. B, C) Write multi-paragraph informational pieces (e.g., letters, descriptions, reports, instructions, essays, articles, interviews). 1.5. Quality of Writing (1.5.8. A, B, C, D) Write with a sharp, distinct focus. Write using well-developed content appropriate for the topic. Write with controlled and/or subtle organization. Write with an understanding of the stylistic aspects of composition. Edit writing using the conventions of language. Spell common, frequently used words correctly. 1.6. Speaking and Listening (1.6.8. A, B, C, D, E, F) Listen to others. Listen to selections of literature (fiction and/or nonfiction). Contribute to discussions. Participate in small and large group discussions and presentations. Use media for learning purposes. 1.8. Research (1.8.8. A, B, C) Locate information using appropriate sources and strategies. Organize, summarize and present the main ideas from research.APPENDIX A Academic Standards for Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening (grade 8)